BUILD WITH UDBHAV
Featured projectRAGFastAPILLM

RAG-based AI Chatbot for PDF Q&A

A retrieval-augmented generation system that turns long PDF documents into a searchable knowledge base and answers questions using semantic retrieval plus an LLM.

Core problemGround answers in document context
ArchitectureParse → Embed → Retrieve → Generate
Primary stackPython · FastAPI · Embeddings · LLM

01 · The problem

How do you make a PDF queryable without sending the whole document to the LLM?

Large documents create a simple engineering problem: the useful answer may be buried hundreds of pages away, while passing the full document into every prompt increases context size, latency and cost.

The project therefore treats the PDF as a retrieval problem first and a generation problem second. The system finds the most relevant pieces of the document, then gives only that evidence to the language model.

02 · System architecture

A retrieval pipeline before the LLM

The core design separates ingestion from question answering. Documents are processed once, indexed, and then reused across queries.

PDF
Document
→
Parse &
Chunk
→
Embeddings
& Index
→
Semantic
Retrieval
↓
Relevant context
→
LLM answer

The LLM is deliberately kept at the end of the pipeline so retrieval quality determines what evidence reaches generation.

03 · Engineering decisions

Where the engineering work matters

Chunking

Split documents into retrievable units instead of treating an entire PDF as one context block. Chunk size and overlap directly influence recall and prompt size.

Embeddings

Represent chunks semantically so a question can retrieve conceptually related passages rather than relying only on exact keyword matches.

Vector retrieval

Use similarity search to narrow a large document collection down to a small set of candidate passages before generation.

FastAPI boundary

Keep ingestion and query operations behind clean API boundaries so the retrieval layer can evolve independently from the client.

Key design principle: a RAG application is only as reliable as its retrieval layer. Better prompting cannot compensate for consistently irrelevant context.

04 · Request lifecycle

What happens when a user asks a question?

  • The API receives the user's question.
  • The question is converted into the same semantic representation used for indexed document chunks.
  • The retrieval layer searches for the most relevant chunks.
  • The selected context is assembled into a constrained generation prompt.
  • The LLM produces an answer grounded in the retrieved document evidence.

05 · Technology

Stack used for the implementation

PythonFastAPIRAGEmbeddingsVector SearchLLM APIsPDF ParsingREST API
Why this project matters for engineering work

It demonstrates the practical boundary between an LLM demo and an AI application: document ingestion, retrieval quality, API design, prompt construction and cost-aware context selection all have to work together.

06 · Continue reading

Related engineering work

Building an AI product?

I can help with the backend, RAG pipeline, LLM integration and production architecture.